Sponsored Links closebtn

Outside companies pay to advertise via these links when specific phrases and words are searched. Clicking on these links will open a new tab displaying that respective companys own website. The website you link to is not affiliated with or sponsored by Kohls.com

Rated 2 out of 5 by from Original? Seriously?! I should have listened to the previous reviews. These are very tight on the thighs, which is fine for me but what's not fine is because they're so tight on the thighs you can only pull them up so far and the waist band is garbage! I don't need my butt hanging out the second I lean forward while STANDING! These are nothing like the originals. Period. I still have all of my originals from 2007 that are JUST NOW starting to fall apart and I just wasted my money on three pair of these to start replacing them.
Date published: 2017-08-27
Rated 1 out of 5 by from When is UA going to fix these? I've been periodically purchasing the 9" boxerjock hoping to find the old version, or that UA went back to the original design. Thus far no luck. I tried again today, and they still have all of the same problems (tight thighs, sit lower on the waist, fall down way too easily). Please UA, fix these. Go back to the original design. They were perfection. I want to give you money for the rest of my life for these boxerjocks, but you guys have to get the design fixed first. Until then know that you're leaving a lot of loyal customers frustrated.
Date published: 2017-06-25
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Make them in Cambodia again!! I agree with all of the other negative reviews, bring back the originals!! I have been wearing the 9 inch boxer jocks for years now and like everyone else said, the fit is totally different now, too tight in the legs and too loose in the waist. I've narrowed it down to where they were manufactured. All of the one's that were made in Cambodia are the best ones and fit perfectly, the one's made in Bangladesh, are wrong and fit different than the originals! Please correct this before you lose a lot of business!
Date published: 2017-07-04
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Very Disappointed in the 9" Boxerjock The 9" Boxerjock of years past used to be very comfortable. This product is uncomfortably tight in the thigh. The waistband is loose and low-cut. This causes the underwear to ride so low on the waist that this product is practically unwearable. I WILL NOT be buying this product again.
Date published: 2017-08-21
  • y_2017, m_9, d_20, h_21
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_59
  • loc_, sid_2955176, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_kohls