Sponsored Links closebtn

Outside companies pay to advertise via these links when specific phrases and words are searched. Clicking on these links will open a new tab displaying that respective companys own website. The website you link to is not affiliated with or sponsored by Kohls.com

Rated 2 out of 5 by from Thin not enough cotton Based on the picture they look thick, they are not. I thought these were going to have more of a cotton feeling but they feel like polyester & spandex. Will be returning these.
Date published: 2014-12-06
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Very narrow toes If you have very narrow toes you might like these. The area where the gold is on the toes is so narrow that only my big toe and the one next to it have yellow on them!! I'm laughing as I write this because they are so rediculous. BUT, if you are blessed with narrow feet all the way down to the toes, you might like these. The annoying part is that the seemed part goes under the other toes which is uncomfortable for me anyway.
Date published: 2014-10-25
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Don't Stay Up At All I have been buying Goldtoe socks for a long time. Never had a problem with quality before. I purchased this 6-pack of socks with the same expectation, but am completely disappointed. I cannot walk even 15 feet without the socks slipping down my foot and bunching up in the arch of my foot. These socks not only don't stay up on my leg, they slip down under my foot, making them very uncomfortable. I don't know how the design changed, but whatever changed really negatively affected this product. Also, the description on my shipping confirmation and order form says fits size 9-11, but now on this web page, it says fits shoe size 6-9. So which is it? I wear a size within that range, so it should be fine either way. Don't buy these socks if you have plans to keep them on your feet.
Date published: 2015-08-18
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Little disappointed Great fit and comfortable, but after 3 washings, one pair got a hole in the toe. I thought Gold Toe brand was supposed to be above the rest. Maybe I got a bad set because the other two pairs are holding up nicely.
Date published: 2016-11-05
  • y_2017, m_9, d_20, h_4
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_18, tr_58
  • loc_, sid_319412, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_kohls
*