Sponsored Links closebtn

Outside companies pay to advertise via these links when specific phrases and words are searched. Clicking on these links will open a new tab displaying that respective companys own website. The website you link to is not affiliated with or sponsored by Kohls.com

Rated 2 out of 5 by from No this is NOT the original straight leg relaxed jean Original straight leg relaxed jean had narrower leg opening and was 100% cotton. When are you going to bring back my beloved 100% cotton straight leg relaxed lee riders? You keep promising but I have yet to see the return of a classic cut 100% straight leg jeans. I don't want spandex! I don't want flared legs! I don't want polyester! I want 100% cotton denim in the original straight leg relaxed lee riders! Can't SOMEONE see that there is a market for this style? We've been begging and pleading for the last several years. Stop trying to 'improve' on the perfect jean and just bring it back.
Date published: 2017-06-22
Rated 1 out of 5 by from I won't buy this product. I used to love the Lee's Original Relaxed Fit jeans. I especially liked that I could buy them in different colors besides the black and the dark blue, and wear them to work with a blazer and stay within my school's dress code. I bought some of the new relaxed fit and they don't fit at all. They hug in all the wrong spots and gap in an equal number of wrong spots. To make matters worse, Lee is now selling the Original Relaxed Fit jeans in just black and traditional blue. I can wear the black to work, but I can't wear blue jeans. You shouldn't remake a product that works.
Date published: 2017-08-17
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Look great from the front but... I'm 5'1" 130 pounds and carry most of my weight below my waist. I usually wear a petite 6 or 8 relaxed fit jean, but it's hard these days to find one anywhere that fits me nicely. Thought I'd give the stretch jeans a shot. These in size 8P look great on me - from the front. They're a little snug in the thighs - not sure what would happen after wearing for a day, or washing, but if that was my only concern, I'd probably give them a real test drive. However, these jeans are NOT ok on me from the back - at least a 2" gap in the waist, and no easy way to take them in. I really need some new jeans! :(
Date published: 2016-02-05
Rated 1 out of 5 by from I bought many of these in the past, but no more. The tag says, "at the waist" but it actually fits way below the waist, especially in the back so that my underwear shows every time I bend over. It also stretches so much, so quickly, that it sags below the butt and feels like it's falling off. I'm constantly grabbing the belt loops and pulling them up in the back. Maybe the kids these days want to show off their underwear but I'm not a kid, so I want my underwear to stay under what I'm wearing. I'll not be buying any more and will donate the latest pair to a charity because they are too uncomfortable to wear. Very disappointed.
Date published: 2016-05-06
  • y_2017, m_12, d_9, h_22
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_2, tr_1209
  • loc_, sid_2406514, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_kohls
*