Rated 1 out of 5Â by Luvable There is something flawed in this product
I ordered 3 pair of Haggar shorts, two in the tan color, and one in black. The black pair is shorter in length, and shorter in zipper length, so are very uncomfortable. I have ordered these Haggar shorts before, so I know that there is something wrong with the black pair. The other color fits just fine. I will be ordering another black pair today, as I was sent a pair that doesn't fit, and they weren't manufactured according to correct sizing.
Rated 2 out of 5Â by Heffe I Agree, Somthing Is Wrong w/ This Product's Size
I think Haggar has a new supplier/manufacturer. And, now Kohl's has a mixed inventory; some old supplier, some new supplier. The new ones don't fit. The waist is the right size, but the leg size and butt are tighter. And, the length is shorter.
Rated 1 out of 5Â by Buddy Inconsistent fit
I recently ordered 4 pairs of Cool 18 shorts which I've worn for several years. I ordered two separate times, 2 pairs in each order.
In both instances one pair fit just fine and the other pair was extremely tight through the pockets and thighs making the shorts impossible to wear.
Since I ordered 4 pairs of the same style I'm very disappointed in the inconsistent fit of the shorts. There is definitely a problem with the manufacturing.
I've worn Haggar shorts and pants for many years and this is the first time I've every experienced a problem but I'm returning the shorts that don't fit and requesting a refund.
Rated 1 out of 5Â by Ronnie68 Classic fit Shorts
I have purchased this product a number of times over the past few years, it is very obvious that the current product has been made by a firm different from the past. The zipper is 5/8" shorter and this impacts the overall fit and tightness to a level that is not acceptable, I am going to return the 3 of the 5 pairs purchased, only because I wore two pair to figure out the issue with the fit. The waist button has been changed as well and is very difficult to engage.
Likely a well meaning effort to reduce costs, but the result is an unsatisfactory product, I will now look elsewhere.